BAML

Brazil Corporate Treasury Update

Report date: 
27 Mar 2024

Commentary

Brazil is a success story. It often does not receive the credit it deserves, because it remains a difficult and complicated place to do business. But all the treasurers involved in this discussion have large and profitable businesses there – there was a time when most people lost money. On the political front, Brazil has recently seen both left and right wing governments, but both have respected election results, and the economy has continued to progress through it all.

Of course, it is not all rosy: though many rules and administrative processes have been relaxed, much complexity remains. In the past, a local treasury presence was required: it is now possible to run the country from offshore, though a specialist team may still be necessary.

The challenges discussed in the call:

  • Boletos: many customers in Brazil pay using boletos. These are a form of bill of exchange, where a document is prepared, usually by the seller, with all the payment information, including a barcode. This can then be presented by the payer in any location, and payment will be received by the seller in their bank account. This is a good system, but participants complained vehemently about the cost, and banks’ unwillingness to reduce the fees. Other issues:
  • Boletos are often cancelled when they are not paid on time and a new one is issued, instead of charging the intended late payment fees. 
  • Payment of a single invoice is often spread over several boletos, each with different due dates: this causes the very accounts receivable reconciliation issues the system is designed to avoid.
  • Boletos can be issued electronically (e-boletos): these reduce the amount of paper but, disappointingly, the fee reduction is not significant.
  • Some participants regularly do RFPs for this business, and frequently change banks. But fees remain high, and banks are often unwilling to continue.
  • Frequent changes in the process and rules present challenges in keeping the systems updated – this often results in manual processing.
  • One participant noted an improvement in service and processing efficiency.
  • PIX: the good news is that a form of on-line payment, PIX, is available and becoming increasingly popular, even for B2B transactions – and the fees are paid by the payor. The bad news is that the fees are also high, though not as high as for boletos. 
  • Tax payments: there is a requirement to maintain accounts with many local banks to make payments to tax authorities around the country. One participant is very happy with a JPMorgan tool to manage this and eliminate the related local accounts. Another used this tool in the past, but is now achieving the same result with Citi.
  • FX documentation

Please Log in or Register to continue reading this commentary

Topics covered in this report: 
Bank Relationships, FX, Hedging FX, Receivables, Boletos, payroll, PIX, Tax, Supply Chain Finance
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Bradesco, Itau, Citi, BAML, JP Morgan, Santander, FXall

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Managing Bank Relationships in Japan

Report date: 
18 Mar 2024

Commentary

With complex countries, we usually think of emerging markets. Japan is one of the most advanced, largest and affluent economies in the world – but it is also a very complex place for foreign companies to operate in.

Usually, the complexity for treasurers comes from regulation. In Japan, this is not the case: the yen is freely traded in one of the deepest markets; cash can be pooled and swept both within the country and across borders; one participant does POBO there; Japanese banks willingly report transactions and balances by MT 940; it has deep and open capital markets; and four of the world’s twenty largest banks by assets are Japanese. Instead, the complexity comes from a very strong culture, which is often not well understood by non Japanese, and which leads to a different way of doing business.

This call, which was well attended and quite animated, went into the challenges foreign treasurers face in this environment. Peers raised the following:

  • High bank fees: Japanese banks are reluctant to negotiate these down
  • Japanese banks are not used to RFPs for cash management – this is not how the domestic market operates. Many large Japanese companies have strong historical relationships with their banks, which often involve minority shareholdings.
  • While MT 940s are not an issue, one participant faced significant issues getting their Japanese bank to implement even a simple host to host communication
  • Communications challenges: it can be difficult to find Japanese employees who speak good English – very few bankers in domestic operations speak it.
  • The need to carefully manage business meetings: these are usually more formal than in many other cultures: deference to senior personnel is required
  • Difficulty managing onshore operations from a remote location: the local online banking tools are nearly all Japanese language only
  • The language issue is further complicated by the katakana character set
  • Resistance of local teams to change, especially if it involves working with foreign banks
  • Complexity in managing relationships and wallet share with Japanese banks, who are often key global providers of credit and FX
  • The use of company chops instead of signatures, and the related control issues
  • The requirement to use local bank accounts for certain types of tax payments
  • Security and confidentiality in Japanese online payment systems is not best in class – one participant had an issue with a single person (not in HR) making all payroll payments
  • Repatriating cash via dividends and intercompany loans is not a problem, but it brings the usual complications: the need for retained earnings (one participant’s business receives advance payments), withholding tax and currency hedging cost. 

How to handle these problems?

  • One peer did an RFP a few years ago, and awarded

Please Log in or Register to continue reading this commentary

Topics covered in this report: 
Bank Relationships, Intercompany loans, Dividends, POBO/ROBO, RFPs, Cash Pooling - cross border, Cash Pooling - domestic
Service providers discussed in this report: 
BAML, JP Morgan, MUFG, Mizuho, SMBC, Citi, HSBC, Standard Chartered, Deutsche Bank

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

India Corporate Treasury Update

Report date: 
20 Feb 2024

Commentary

Calls on India are always well attended: there is never a shortage of items to discuss. It is already a very large market, and it continues to grow – so all international companies are motivated to manage its many complexities. 

Complexity is something at which India excels: the regulations are many, varied, and never easy to navigate. It can be difficult to know exactly what they are: as often happens, we spent a lot of time trying to establish what is, and what is not, allowed. At the same time, the country has come a long way. Many things which used to be forbidden are now allowed: cash can be brought into and out of the country with relative ease, though not without red tape. The authorities are relatively flexible and business friendly. India is in the vanguard of efforts to move away from cash for retail transactions: this may be mostly for tax reasons, but it reflects the country’s leading position in technology.

At the same time, it remains a very large country, with significant regional variations, including language, climate, culture and religion – so differences will continue to exist. Our conversation covered the following points:

  • The economy continues to perform well, though competition is fierce – and, in some areas, India continues to favour national champions.
  • Operations: most peers had different legal entities in India involved in different activities: manufacturing, R&D, shared service centres, marketing, etc. Intercompany lending within the country, while permitted, can be complicated.
  • Onshore versus centralised treasury: many MNCs have local treasury teams, due to the regulations and complexity. This is beginning to change: several participants are starting to bring India into their centralised structures. 
  • Similarly, most peers are only using international banks in the country, and shutting down relationships with local banks. One participant attributed this in part to a regulatory requirement to link lending activity to transactional business – especially as the foreign banks can now provide complete services.
  • Another peer

Please Log in or Register to continue reading this commentary

Topics covered in this report: 
Bank Relationships, FX, Hedging FX, Payments - cross border, Intercompany loans, Cash Pooling - domestic, Cash Repatriation, Payments - domestic, Funding
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Citi, HSBC, JP Morgan, BAML, Standard Chartered, BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Mexico - Corporate Treasury Update

Report date: 
12 Jan 2024

Commentary

In many ways, Mexico is a paradox. It has a vital, and complicated, relationship with its northern neighbour: apart from anything else, migration across its land border into the USA is a significant, and highly contentious, topic in US domestic politics.

But the reality is that Mexico has a thriving economy, and has modernised its financial and banking infrastructure to the point where the consensus on the call was that it is a country where it is relatively easy to work, and where most modern treasury management techniques can be used. There are no exchange controls, cash can be freely transferred across the national borders, and cross border cash pooling is regularly practiced. FX hedging can be done freely both onshore and offshore, and the country is well banked, with both good local banks and most international banks being well represented.

Despite this overall positive environment, we still had a lively call. There are a series of challenges, and some points were not always totally clear. None is particularly serious, but they still take up management time and attention:

  • Citibank operate through a relationship with Banamex. While this works well, several participants reported service level issues, and there were challenges with data not being transmitted through the IT systems. This resulted in manual interventions which should not have been required.
  • Consistent with their global strategy, Citi/Banamex are withdrawing from the retail banking sector. For some participants, this caused a problem, as banks in Mexico share the Latin American practice of giving employees a better deal on their retail banking services if the company pays payroll through them.
  • Otherwise, some participants reported issues setting up and managing local
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Topics covered in this report: 
Bank Accounts, Bank Relationships, Cash Pooling - cross border, intercompany netting, payroll, POBO/ROBO
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Banamex, JP Morgan, HSBC, Bank Mendes Gans, BAML, BBVA, Citi

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury, FX & Banking in Colombia & Peru

Report date: 
24 Jul 2023

Commentary

In our last call on Colombia and Peru in October 2021[https://www.complexcountries.com/treasury-fx-in-colombia-peru], there were concerns about political uncertainty. Since then, the president of Peru has been impeached and a left wing former guerrilla elected president of Colombia has been beset by scandals. So how has this impacted the companies operating in the countries?

In short, not a great deal. Currency volatility continues to be a challenge and reduced foreign investment has hampered growth. But in terms of politics the markets are relatively sanguine as the respective governments stumble along without enough power to make radical changes and the long run potential remains.

From a Latin American perspective both countries are relatively easy to operate in for treasury, with local teams coping well with the challenges.  

Colombia:

  • Most companies repatriate cash via dividends and intercompany loans. The process involves a lot of admin, but it works.
  • Funding is relatively easy but also entails a lot of bureaucracy and it is essential to get communications with DIAN (the tax & customs agency) accurate.
  • Some companies avoid the transaction tax (‘cuatro por mil’) by parking cash in fiduciary accounts for 24 hours. It saves money but, again a lot of form filing.
  • The currency volatility also caused one participant to have their local credit dramatically reduced
  • Citi is the
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password to Log in.
Topics covered in this report: 
Cash Repatriation, Bank Relationships, FX, Hedging FX, Funding, T&E Management
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Citi, JP Morgan, BBVA, Santander, BAML, Banco Davivienda, BNP Paribas, Scotia, Bancolombia, Banco de Bogotá, Banco de Credito del Peru

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Treasury & FX in India

Report date: 
20 Feb 2023

Commentary

This Treasury Peer Call took place a few days after the announcement that India had officially overtaken China as the most populous country in the world. Given the increasing speculation that India might also replace China as the world’s fastest growing major economy, it seemed opportune to get a view on how things are developing.

All participants are bullish about their businesses in the country. Several already have significant operations, and most see major opportunities. The good news is that several participants are generating meaningful profits and cash – the bad news is that this creates issues in terms of cash investment and repatriation. And, of course, India is India – there are always plenty of regulations to navigate.

Main points and concerns:

  • For those companies who are generating cash, it is a challenge to invest it. Most retain a conservative approach, which means safe investments – these typically return a rate which is below inflation.
  • Cash repatriation is not without issues. The main vehicle is dividends: these attract withholding tax (the rate varies according to the jurisdictions), and are subject to complex tax rules. Cross border pooling is not allowed, and intercompany loans are subject to central bank approval.
  • Within India, cash pooling is
Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & Log in
Topics covered in this report: 
Investments, Hedging FX, Cash Pooling - domestic, Supply Chain Finance, Intercompany loans, HR, Payments-digital, Funding, Cash Repatriation
Service providers discussed in this report: 
Barclays, JP Morgan, BAML, Citi, Standard Chartered, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, MUFG, ICICI, HDFC, Kotak Mahindra Bank

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

FX & Treasury in South Korea

Report date: 
25 Nov 2022

Commentary

South Korea is a market which it is notoriously difficult for foreigners to penetrate: this applies as much to banks as it does to industrial companies. The culture is fiercely patriotic, and the vitality of South Korean industry means that most products are available from local companies, who are often world leaders.

The result is a situation where, despite the size of the economy – in 2021, it had the world’s 10th largest GDP, ahead of Brazil and Russia – it tends not to be a major market for most non South Korean MNCs. This was reflected in the call, where the country is complicated, and not a major focus for most participants. The situation is further complicated by language – English language skills can be rare amongst local staff and banks – and by a significant reluctance on the part of staff and customers to work with foreign banks. When you add in a series of specific, and very strong, local customs and processes, such as customers who often insist on making payments in person, you have a challenging situation.

Despite all of this, our participants manage to work successfully. Cross border cash pooling is possible, using the Consolidated Management of Funds (CMF) structure, which has to be approved by the Bank of Korea. The approval process is burdensome and requires a lot of work – and it all has to be done in Korean. But it works. 

Equally, dividends can be paid – but again, there is bureaucracy. Currency trades must be settled onshore, so many people find it easier to use the offshore NDF market, which is fairly liquid. Intercompany netting has to be gross in gross out – and the won can be remitted offshore. Cross border intercompany loans

 

Please Login or Register to access the rest of this free commentary.
If you haven't previously Logged in but receive commentaries via email, simply use your email address to change your password & LogIn
Topics covered in this report: 
Cash Pooling - cross border, Hedging FX, Bank Relationships, Collections - domestic, CMF, Netting, Dividends, Virtual accounts
Service providers discussed in this report: 
HSBC, JP Morgan, Standard Chartered, BAML, Citi

Please log in, or create a free account, to read the whole report summary.

Pages